Comments on: Mr. Obama’s Stock Recommendations

By: Gerald

Gerald — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:12:54 +0000

The market and wallstreet do not have a place in the bama’s world. He’s not minding anything he does not believe in. His indifference may never change while he is in office.
Get the change and hope you where expecting?

By: pmg

pmg — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:39:56 +0000

Actually, I assume it was lack of respect, rather than disrespect. Since Mr. Obama has shown absolutely no leadership skills to this point, I wouldn’t address him as ‘President’ either. Actions, not titles, garner respect. That’s why Bush will always be ‘that stupid little man’.

By: Tim Seretis

Tim Seretis — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 15:59:32 +0000

In times of crisis, the more stupid the leaders, the worse the effects of the crisis will be. Yet there may be a way to mitigate the crisis: the current leaders need to be forced out of office as soon as possible and replaced by responsible ones who truly represent the voters.

Mr. President:
I am a Republican that has stuck his neck out for you. I have spoken out loud in supporting your efforts to save our nations. I have condemned all those that have stated for you to fail. They do not realize that if you fail, our nation fails. Once the pillar of strength and respect, our nation will be owned by those that loaned us money. If you fail, people will fail. No jobs. No living wage. No families.
Mr. President, I ask of you to please cut the strings. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are the puppet masters and they are pulling all the strings and you are the puppet. During your campaign you stated that you would go line by line and get rid of spending that is useless, yet you have allowed the puppet masters to waste valuable money on items and issues that have nothing to do with helping the nation and the people. If you were going to spent all of that money, instead of giving it to the puppet masters and their friends, you should have put your foot down and told them that the trillions of dollars would go directly to the people. You could have easily gave $40,000.00 to married tax paying people, and $20,000.00 to single tax paying people, making under $250,000.00

By: joe

joe — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:22:06 +0000

What is a “profit and earnings” ratio?

By: LaP

LaP — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:20:11 +0000

Mr. Obama cannot be held responsible for his comments. At the time, he was not standing in front of a teleprompter with the appropriate sound-bite. With no knowledge of economics, fiscal policy, and business practices… he just says the first thing that pops into his mind.
Not to worry, the spin doctors will have it all erased from all the media outlets and they can then deny any statement was ever made.
It’s good to be KING.

By: Bodo

Bodo — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:50:15 +0000

What is a “profit and earnings ratio”?

By: tracy

tracy — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:14:21 +0000

In regards to referring to President Obama as Barak Obama. Reporters frequently addressed former President Bush as Mr. Bush long before the completion of his term.

Barack Obama in the debates addressed Senator John McCain as John while John McCain addressed Barack as Senator Obama. Why the double standard?

Back to the issue at hand. How is recommending stock purchases appropriate at this time? Who really benefits when companies are failing in significant numbers. Wasn’t speculation what put us in this situation anyhow? Just a thought.

How about a little common sense here.

By: Searcse

Searcse — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:56:15 +0000

The only fact I saw is “OBAMA SPEAKS, MARKET DROPS!!!”

By: Dan

Dan — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:08:54 +0000

I want President Obama to succeed. But turning his head on the current multi billion dollar bill full of earmarks is disheartening. If you want to watch the stodk market collaspe, watch if this President foolishly turns the labor unions free to infiltrate and control our largest industries. The auto industry should be a reality check. Capitalism embraces innovation and entrepreneurship not labor unions. Unions thrive in a socialistic environment, but last time I looked we were still free market capitalists.

By: chas

chas — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:01:20 +0000

“…potentially a good deal…” Does this President own any stock? Is he invested in the markets? Most of our Presidents have been rooted in Capitalism and realize that unless our markets are thriving, the economy is dying. Regulating the economy is a sign he knows little about our free markets. This President is about CONTROL rather than free economic markets – he is a socialist rather than a capitalist.