November 28, 2008 9:43AM
India, Gold and Oil
By Ray Hennessey
-
Share:
Indian stocks, at least the ones that trade here in the U.S., largely shrugged off the terrorist attacks in Mumbai. Surprisingly, so have commodities -- and that should tell you how inefficient the markets have been lately. Don't underestimate the impact and future risk the attacks represent.
One would expect the "right" trade on the India attacks to be two-fold: long gold, short oil. Oil should suffer because the attacks should impair growth in India -- one of the countries that received the most blame (or credit) for the run up in crude prices earlier this year. Remember the pitch? Demand from India (and China) accounted for the rise. If the Indian economy is indeed hurt by these attacks, that dampens demand even more.
Gold gets more attractive if you think that the terror attacks are sign of things to come (or a reminder of the real security risks this world faces). Gold is a safety play. It is real. It is valuable. It doesn't disappear like paper capital.
The trade in both gold and oil have been muted somewhat by the recent rise in the dollar and the fear of deflation here in the U.S. But gold could shoot up and oil collapse if the attacks are followed up by others or if they spark more tension between India and Pakistan. Remember: the early read on this is that the attacks were carried out by Islamic terrorists hitting Western, Hindu and Jewish targets. And the recent talk that it was perpetrated by what Indian officials will call only "foreigners" suggests India's government strongly suspects Pakistani involvement.
The markets have always (ignorantly) discounted the tension in that region. There is a real chance that these same tensions come front and center now, with the uncertainty of the new Obama administration's response to the conflict thrown into the mix for good measure. Look for gold and oil prices to be the proxy of how this conflict progresses.
-
Share:
Gold, so says Citi, will or could go to 2,000.00 per ounce with-in 2 years or even in 2009. It is also stated that silver would increase around 7.6% on the gold price which would equal 154.00 per silver ounce. Looks like the dollar is crying for something to back it. Why not value the gold at 10,000 an ounce and back the dollar again with our Gold, that I assume is still at Fort Knox. If there, it just sits. China has 600 tonnes of gold and wants to increase that to 4,000 tonnes. From what I can gather gold is getting in short supply, and hear the comex gold contracts are finding it hard to deliver the physical gold. Who is the official title that owns the gold at Fort Knox?
China, India, Japan and Russia ALL are going after it,.
China flat out says it’s their future for energy.
And hands down -it’s clean. Cleaner than anything we have.
starts with an h